Search within:
Student explaining research to physician using research poster on poster board
Ohio Osteopathic Symposium Research and Scholarly Activity Competition

OOS Research and Scholarly Activity Competition

  • Ohio Osteopathic Symposium logo
  • Important Dates

    Abstract Deadline: January 31, 2026

    Poster Event: Saturday, April 25, 2026

  • Overview

    • Medical students, interns, residents and fellows are eligible to participate.
    • The abstract can be a maximum of 250-words.
    • One abstract is permitted per person.
    • The abstract deadline is January 31, 2026.
    • Three Competition Categories:
      • Biomedical/Clinical Research
      • Social/Behavioral Medicine/Medical Education
      • Case Reports
    • Cash prizes will be awarded in each of the three categories.
  • Guidelines

    • Abstracts must be complete and include introduction, background/significance, methods/case description, results and conclusions and list all co-authors and affiliations.
    • Literature reviews and incomplete research projects are not eligible. Research abstracts in the Biomedical/Clinical Research and the Social/Behavioral Medicine/Medical Education categories must include results and conclusions.
    • Authors meeting abstract criteria will be invited to participate in a live in-person poster judging event on Saturday, April 25, 2026 at the Ohio Osteopathic Symposium.
    • Winners from each of the three competition categories will be announced at the Ohio Osteopathic Symposium following the poster session. Participants must be present to win.

Poster Competition Instructions and Evaluation Criteria

  • All participants will be provided 4’ x 8’ bulletin board on which to display their poster.
  • Posters can be any size as long as they fit on the bulletin board.
  • Push-pins will be provided.

The presenter will be scored in following categories:

Biomedical/Clinical Research
Social/Behavioral/Med Ed/Program Evaluation
Case Reports
Introduction described the purpose and/or objectives of the study. Background and significance of the study were discussed in relationship to published literature.Introduction described the rarity, unique presentation, or teaching opportunities of the case.
Methodology section described the study design, appropriate controls, and execution of study methodology.Background and significance of the case were discussed in relationship to published literature.
Results were clearly explained. Statistical or data analysis was clearly described.Provided a concise but comprehensive case review of the circumstances surrounding the patient situation.
Conclusions were appropriate to the background, purpose and objectives of the study. Results accurately supported the conclusions.Conclusion was appropriate to the background of the disease process and the case presentation. Discussed how this knowledge could be used in future practice.
Presenter demonstrated poise, confidence and knowledge of study.Presenter demonstrated poise, confidence and knowledge of study.
Poster was easily readable and supported presentation.Poster was easily readable and supported presentation.
Overall quality of research presentation.Overall quality of case presentation.

For More Information

Karen Collins, MPA
Associate Director of Research Administration
Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine
Ohio University