Engineering Technology and Management Accreditation
The Bachelor of Science in Engineering Technology and Management degree program at the Russ College has been accredited by The Association of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering (ATMAE) since 1979.
Accreditation means quality assurance and continuous improvement. The Association of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering is the primary accrediting body for undergraduate technology management programs in the U.S. Completing an accredited undergraduate program ensures that your education meets the quality standards set by professional and technical societies in the profession.
The online Bachelor of Science in Project Management, as a program offered by Ohio University, is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission.
Visit the Russ College accreditation page to see enrollment and graduation data.
Guiding Principles
The work of Engineering Technology and Management (ETM) is steered by our mission, vision, and guiding principles.
Student Outcomes
The learning outcomes for the Bachelor of Science in Engineering Technology & Management are a combination of goals identified by department faculty and the desired outcomes of the Society of Manufacturing Engineers. The learning outcome categories are employment, technical competence, materials and processes, product and process design, management competence, quality management, enterprise systems, communication, diversity, professionalism and ethical behavior, and project management.
View the complete list of student outcomes.
Assessment & Results
The ETM department has mapped individual ETM course competencies to each of the ETM program Learning Outcomes. This mapping process provides insurance and evidence that all outcomes are addressed throughout the ETM program. This mapping process also provides methods of assessment for each of the course competencies. These assessments include student projects, quizzes, tests, presentations, papers, portfolios as well as other assessment techniques. Student success in gaining these learning outcomes is based on passing of the ETM courses which is based on cumulative assessment scores in each course. In addition to individual course assessments, the ETM program requires all ETM seniors to take the Certified Manufacturing Specialist exam. This certification test was selected due to its alignment with the majority of the ETM program outcomes. In addition, the certification exam is a national test provided and controlled by the Association of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering (ATMAE). ATMAE is also a specialized program accreditation agency recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA).
BSETM retention rate
| Fall Entry Cohort | Retained to Second Fall | Retained to Third Fall | Retained to Fourth Fall |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fall 2019 | 87.5% | 83.3% | 87.5% |
| Fall 2020 | 75.0% | 70.0% | 50.0% |
| Fall 2021 | 68.4% | 47.4% | 31.6% |
| Fall 2022 | 88.5% | 80.8% | 76.9% |
| Fall 2023 | 86.7% | 90.0% | N/A |
| Fall 2024 | 86.0% | N/A | N/A |
BSETM graduate satisfaction survey results (2020 – 2026)
| Survey Questions | Strongly Agree (%) | Agree (%) | Combined Agree (%) | Total Responses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Courses are balanced with appropriate lab/lecture time. | 57.0% | 39.9% | 96.9% | 253 |
| Courses motivate me to succeed. | 48.2% | 47.8% | 96.1% | 253 |
| Scheduling of ETM courses suited my needs. | 45.2% | 46.1% | 91.2% | 253 |
| Adequate assistance from faculty/advisers. | 61.4% | 33.8% | 95.2% | 253 |
| Facilities and equipment support class objectives. | 56.1% | 40.4% | 96.5% | 253 |
| Computer systems are adequately available. | 45.2% | 42.1% | 87.3% | 253 |
| Classes include computer applications instruction. | 50.0% | 46.5% | 96.5% | 253 |
| Instructors are innovative in teaching approaches | 50.4% | 44.7% | 95.2% | 253 |
BSETM graduate satisfaction to program learning outcomes (2020-2026)
| Program Learning Outcome | Strongly Agree (%) | Agree (%) | Combined Agree (%) | Total Responses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LO1 Employment & Application of Knowledge | 71.0% | 27.2% | 98.2% | 253 |
| LO2 Technical Competence | 62.2% | 37.3% | 99.6% | 253 |
| LO3 Materials & Processes | 60.9% | 36.9% | 97.8% | 253 |
| LO4 Product & Process Design | 66.7% | 32.9% | 99.6% | 253 |
| LO5 Management Competence | 57.3% | 42.2% | 99.6% | 253 |
| LO6 Quality Management | 59.6% | 38.2% | 97.8% | 253 |
| LO7 Enterprise Systems | 48.9% | 43.6% | 92.4% | 253 |
| LO8 Communication | 58.5% | 38.4% | 96.9% | 253 |
| LO9 Diversity Awareness | 52.0% | 40.9% | 92.9% | 253 |
| LO10 Professionalism & Ethics | 66.7% | 31.1% | 97.8% | 253 |
| LO11 Project Management | 63.1% | 32.0% | 95.1% | 253 |
BSETM capstone (ETM 4622) average GPA
S2024 | F2024 | S2025 | F2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETM 4622 | 3.332 | 3.1435 | 3.1426 | 3.037 |
Graduate Employment
The summarized employment information of ETM graduates during 2023 – 2025 collected through surveys and LinkedIn contacts is presented below. Graduate employment data demonstrate strong post-graduation outcomes for BSETM students. Most graduates reported employment in engineering, manufacturing, quality, project management, systems engineering, and technical sales roles, with a smaller number pursuing graduate studies. Employment and education reporting rates exceeded 80%, indicating robust placement and effective tracking of graduate outcomes. The average reported salaries are $67,400 (2023), $71,635 (2024), and $76,531 (2025). Reported average salaries increased from 2023 to 2025, reflecting positive workforce demand and the relevance of program learning outcomes to industry needs.
| Position Title | Company / Organization |
|---|---|
| Field Engineer | Kiewit Infrastructure |
| Technical Sales Engineer | Parker Hannifin |
| Quality Engineer | Honda Development and Manufacturing of America |
| Implementation Engineer | Fenetech |
| Software Engineer | CNH Industrial / Crown Castle |
| New Model Engineer | Honda Motor Company |
| Process Engineer | General Mills |
| Sales Engineer | Baluff Inc. |
| Engineer (Engineering Development Program) | Reynolds Consumer Products |
| Distribution Engineer I | TRC |
| Quality Control Technician | EOS Energy |
| Combat Systems Specialist | United States Air Force |
| Process Engineer | Star Plastics |
| Project Engineer | Auto Tools Inc. |
| Graduate Student | Ohio University |
| Advanced Manufacturing Engineer | Honeywell Aerospace |
| Process Engineer | Prince & Izant Company |
| Manufacturing Engineer | Terra Sonic International |
| Graduate Student | Ohio University |
| Systems Engineer | Rovisys Inc. |
| Quality Logistics Engineer | NIFCO |
| Associate Engineer | L.J. Star Inc. |
| Project Engineer | Mammoth Prefab |
| Manufacturing Engineer | Babcock & Wilcox |
| Product Quality Engineer | Roush Performance Products |
| Applications Engineer | Thyssenkrupp |
| Cyber Analyst | Nationwide |
| Warehouse Manager | Tent Inc. |
| Channel Account Manager | Vertiv Technology Solutions |
| Graduate Student | Ohio University |
| Technical Sales Engineer | OSG USA |
| Manufacturing / Quality Engineer | Nidec Motor Corporation – Imperial Electric |
| Manufacturing Engineer | Kenworth Truck Company |
| Manufacturing Engineer | Ariel Corporation |
| Technical Service Engineer | Ariel Corporation |
| Engineering Technical Writer II | Aloft Aero Architects |
| Project Engineer | Autotool Inc. |
| Engineering Development Position | Honda Motor Company |
| Entry-Level Manufacturing Engineer | Honda Motor Company |
| Quality Engineer | Honda Motor Company |
| Sales Engineer I | Keyence |
| Engineering Project Leader | KTH Parts Industries |
| Production Engineer I | L-H Battery Company |
| Associate Engineer | Luvata |
| Product Engineer | McWane Ductile |
| Engineering Technologist | OVEC |
| Systems Engineer | Rovisys |
| Assistant Project Manager | Shelly and Sands |
| Project Engineer | Sunesis Construction |
| Project Engineer | THK |
| Field Engineer | Tuner Construction |
| Assistant Project Engineer | Turner Construction |
| Product Manager – Chilled Water Liquid Cooling | Vertiv |
| Manufacturing engieer | Schaeffler |
| Project engineer | Kokosing Industrial Inc |
| Applications engineer | Expert Crane Inc |
| Tooling Engineer | Nifco America Corp |
| Sales Engineer | OSG USA, Inc. |
| Project Engineer | Project Technologies & Services, Ltd |
| Systems engineer | RoviSYS |
| Manufacturing engineer | American Honda Motor Company, Inc |
| Metrology engineer | AT&F |
| Product engineer | Global Chilled Water Systems |
| Technical sales engineer | OSG USA, Inc. |
| Project Engineer | Sunesis Construction |
| Engineer | Turner Construction |
Data collected from the Graduate Exit Survey and the Recent Graduate Survey (2020 – 2026) indicate positive employment outcomes for ETM graduates. 59.29% of senior students had accepted employment at the time they completed the survey, which was administered immediately prior to graduation. 62% of seniors reported completing at least one co-op or internship experience, demonstrating strong engagement in experiential learning and workforce preparation.
Results from the Recent Graduate Survey (2020 – 2026) indicate that 33.33% of respondents received more than one job offer, and 33.33% reported interviewing with more than one company, reflecting strong employer interest and competitive workforce demand for ETM graduates.
Program Improvement
The ETM Department employs a variety of techniques to collect feedback and data on program evaluation for continuous program improvements. Techniques include:
Student Evaluation of Teachings (SET evaluation conducted by Blue)
Ohio University conducts Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) through a third-party platform (Blue) to collect student feedback on course objectives, the appropriateness of course content, effectiveness of course delivery, and overall quality of instruction. All courses are required to administer SETs at the end of each semester, with data collected prior to final exam week. Students rate multiple items using a five-point scale, and an open-ended section is provided for written comments and recommendations.
The Graduate Exit Survey
The ETM Department administers a Graduate Exit Survey to all senior students enrolled in the capstone course during their final semester. The purpose of the survey is to assess student perceptions of the program’s effectiveness in preparing them for employment, the relevance and achievement of the defined program learning outcomes, the relevance and effectiveness of program competencies derived from those learning outcomes, and overall student satisfaction with the program. Areas of evaluation include instructional quality, equipment and facilities, advising, career placement service, and other aspects of the student experience.
The Recent Graduate Survey
The ETM Department administers the Recent Graduate Survey to alumni who have graduated within the previous two years on a recurring cycle of every three to five years. The purpose of this survey is to evaluate graduate placement and employment outcomes, assess alumni perceptions of the program’s effectiveness in preparing them for professional practice based on real-world work experience, and gather feedback on the relevance of program learning outcomes and competencies. Survey results are reviewed by the department to identify strengths and areas for improvement and are used to inform curricular revisions, instructional enhancements, and other continuous improvement efforts within the BSETM program.
The Graduate Follow-up Survey
The ETM Department administers the Graduate Follow-Up Survey to alumni who graduated more than two years prior to assess long-term career outcomes. The purpose of this survey is to evaluate graduate job advancement, including changes in roles, responsibilities, and professional growth, as well as alumni satisfaction with the program’s preparation for employment and career development. The survey also collects feedback on the continued relevance of program learning outcomes and competencies in professional practice. Results are reviewed by the department to identify trends in career progression and to support continuous improvement of the BSETM program through curricular updates, instructional enhancements, and strategic planning.
The Employer Satisfaction Survey
The ETM Department conducts the Employer Satisfaction Survey to assess employers’ satisfaction with the performance and competencies of our graduates in relation to the program learning outcomes. The survey also solicits employer comments and suggestions to support continuous program improvement. While data collection can be challenging, the department has made concerted efforts to reach employers by leveraging Industrial Advisory Board (IAB) connections and alumni networks. Feedback from the ETM Industrial Advisory Board