Science, Women, and Feminist Theory: Public Interest Implications

Cassandra Pinnick
Western Kentucky University
October 15th, 2004, 4:00 to 5:30 pm
Ellis 113

pinnick2Science needs money. And, significant sums of public monies are spent to support science. As a matter of course, we expect that public expenditures are made based on reasoned and well-supported policy. Anything less would be an outrage. Feminist theories about science, and a feminist project to reform science, would shape policy about, and affect funding for, science. Yet decisions, based on feminist theory about science, are decisions based on a house of cards. This is because the feminist rationale remains unsubstantiated. In particular, we have no data that would test the strength of the hypothesis as asserting a causal relationship between women and cognitive ends. Thus, we must remain agnostic about the evidentiary merits or demerits of this feminist project. And, by extension, any funding or policy decisions taken in the name of this project rest on no more than dogma.

Cassandra Pinnick, a California native born in Watts, completed her undergraduate degree in 1973, at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, in Philosophy with a minor in Mathematics. She practised law as a private practitioner from 1976 through 1987, in California and Hawaii. In 1993, under the supervision of Larry Laudan, she completed the Ph.D. in Philosophy, at the University of Hawaii – Manoa. She joined the faculty at Western Kentucky University in 1992, and has primary responsibility for courses in logic and philosophy of science.

She is a Fellow at the Center for the Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, and was a Resident Fellow at the Center for the academic year 2000-2001. Since 2001, she has been Visiting Faculty in Philosophy and Logic, at the Universidad de Guanajuato, Mexico. In 2004, she became the first Executive Secretary for the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science (HOPOS). In 2003, Pinnick was an invited speaker at the GAP.5 meetings, the Fifth International Congress for Analytic Philosophy, in Bielefeld, Germany. In 2004, she was a speaker at the 5th Quadrennial International Fellows conference, Krakow (Rytro), Poland, and at the Fifth Biennial Congress for the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science (HOPOS), San Francisco.

Pinnick’s research concerns the epistemology of evidence, justification, and belief, and she is interested to link these philosophical topics to important public policy debate.

She is co-editor, with Noretta Koertge and Robert F. Almeder, of Scrutinizing Feminist Epistemology: an Examination of Gender in Science (Rutgers University Press 2003). Her work is published in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Metascience, Science & Education, Social Epistemology, Social Studies of Science, and the International Journal for Philosophy of Science.

This entry was posted in 2004 and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.