![]()
![]()
(go to main index of Lab Instructions | Writing & Rhetoric II)
DUE for START of
LAB SIX-B
the finished Ghastly Resort Hotel exercise (hotel_yourlastname),
ready for saving in the shared folder -- most of you will finish this during
the class
three email messages copied or forwarded to me as described
in the Writing Ping-Pong exercise
text reading
online text: Trimble / Readability (click on link and print the document)
pay special attention to Tips for Improving Your
Readability pp 73-81
Lunsford
Research: Ch14-15: Preparing for a Research Project, Doing Research
This is an interactive way to practice improving both grammar and style -- and to get to know your reference text. You will be sending out and receiving examples of incorrect grammar or weak style. By email reply, you will rewrite those examples and confirm in your textbook what was suggested as an improvement.
The replies to your messages may take some time -- so just do your part and check your mail later. Just like this exercise, questions of grammar and style will always pop in and out of your writing efforts. Make a habit of consulting a writer's reference.
For this exercise, you will be using Lunsford's The Everyday Writer (make sure you're choosing "e-Book").
If your access is not working, tell me and I will sign you in temporarily.
- one example as it would read before the changes suggested by Lunsford
- hint at the kind of change needed by adding the title of the sub-section (or make up your own clue)
- identify the message with writing PING in the subject line
- make sure the text of the original message is included and replace the subject line with writing PONG
- please, try your changes without checking the text
Rhetoric in writing is the means by which your reactions as a reader are influenced (at least) and controlled (at most). Alert, responsible readers always question what the motivation is, not only for the content of statements, but for the way they are expressed. Does the language have a 'spin'? Is the language neutral, positive, or negative? Who stands to gain by the particular way in which the content is expressed. With advertisements, the motivation is very clear -- the company paying for the ad wants to sell the product or service. However, rhetoric is a part of all writing, and the motivations on the part of the writer can be conscious and designed, or unconscious and ingrained.
The best way to see how your responses are influenced by rhetoric is to briefly take on the role of a writer using rhetoric for a purpose. The following exercise will give a 'spin' or slant to a number of statements. In this case, you are changing negatives to positives, but you could also be starting with positives and changing them to negatives.
Note that, if done well, none of the statements will become a lie -- you will either suppress information or reinterpret it for your intended effect. For a short time, use language like a politician! After doing so, you'll be more sensitive to both levels of rhetoric -- the blatant using loaded words and hidden agendas, and the subtle using mild connotation and nuances in emphasis.
go to top | main index of Lab Instructions | Writing & Rhetoric II
This page
is maintained by David Sharpe
Please email comments or suggestions to