Study Examines Benefits Of Weight Training
Contact: Robert Staron, (740) 593-2409; staron@ohio.edu
Attention reporters, editors: For a copy of the journal article on which
this news release is based, call Andrea Gibson at (740) 597-2166 or
Charlene Clifford at (740) 593-0946.
ATHENS, Ohio (May 22, 2000) -- People interested in maintaining good health should
consider adding weight training to their exercise regimen, according to a
new Ohio University study.
The research, published in a recent issue of the Journal of Strength
and Conditioning Research, counters other studies and news reports that have
given weight lifting a bad name, said anatomist Robert Staron, lead
researcher on the project.
Staron and his colleagues followed 32 healthy men and women age 19-26
who were not using weights regularly. During the eight-week weight, or
resistance, training program, participants did three different exercises
for the lower body twice a week. Researchers studied blood samples from
participants taken during and after the study, paying close attention to
lipoproteins, which transport water-insoluble fats in the blood and are
involved in an individual's overall cholesterol count.
Although researchers noted no reduction in cholesterol in healthy
young men and women, they also found no increase. But the participants did show
other health benefits, including a significant decrease in body fat and
increase in muscle strength, an interesting result given the short duration
of the study.
"I think our research has shown, and other research supports this,
that resistance training is not a bad thing," said Staron, an associate
professor of anatomy in the university's College of Osteopathic Medicine.
"It's becoming apparent that any activity is good, whether it's resistance
training, endurance training or a combination of both. There are some
benefits you can get from strength training that you can't get from
endurance training and vice versa."
Some studies by scientists elsewhere had found that weight lifting
increased cholesterol levels, while other studies found the exercise
decreased cholesterol. The contradiction prompted Staron to launch this
short-term, high intensity study. His findings suggest that young, healthy
people experience no change in cholesterol levels as a result of weight
training, but added that it's possible that any exercise, including
resistance training, could improve lipoprotein levels in people with high
cholesterol.
"Long term resistance training could have a positive impact on lipid
profile," Staron said. "And when we consider all the favorable changes that
did occur during the study, continued training may well have resulted in
favorable changes in cholesterol."
This study differs from previous ones because the researchers examined
the changes in muscle fiber composition and size, offering a broader view of
the effects of strength training on all aspects of the muscle and body.
"We had an advantage over other studies because we did so much data
collection," Staron said. "We conducted blood tests and biopsies, so we
were actually able to look inside the muscle to see what changes occurred
during the course of the training period."
This latest study is part of a larger project by Staron and his
colleagues that is focused on how muscles respond to weight training. Last year, they
published research that found that molecular changes in the muscle begin
within two to four weeks of initiating resistance training, far earlier
than previously thought. What's more, Staron found that muscles appear to
respond to even limited weight training - he noted significant changes in
the thigh muscles after just four workouts.
Staron, an avid weight lifter himself, now plans to study how training
affects the muscle itself: a project on the differences between performing
one set versus three sets of a strength training exercise and one that
compares the effects of exercise on a home exercise machine to a free
weights routine.
The study was funded by the National Strength and Conditioning
Association and the College of Osteopathic Medicine.
Co-authors of the study are Thomas Murray, Frederick Hagerman and
Robert Hikida, all of the College of Osteopathic Medicine, Roger Gilders of the
College of Health and Human Services, and Kerry Ragg of Student Health
Service.