Assessment Review Guide1997-98
Unit being reviewed: _____________________________________________________
This form is to be used by the Assessment Review Committee for evaluating academic units assessment reports. Please circle the answer that best describes how well the unit addressed each question, and circle the answer that best describes how well the unit addressed each guideline. A space is provided for additional comments after each question.
Guideline I: Unit Goals for Student Learning
1. Poor 2. Fair 3. Good 4. Very Good 5. Excellent Cant Evaluate
The units goals for student learning are clearly stated.
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent Cant Evaluate
COMMENT:
The units goals have been modified based on previous assessment reports.
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent Cant Evaluate
COMMENT:
Faculty are involved in all aspects of this units assessment.
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent Cant Evaluate
COMMENT:
Guideline II: Assessment Methods and Processes
1. Poor 2. Fair 3. Good 4. Very Good 5. Excellent Cant Evaluate
The units assessment is systematic, not limited to anecdotes.
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent Cant Evaluate
COMMENT:
The unit used multiple measures of assessment.
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent Cant Evaluate
COMMENT:
Guideline III: Data Analysis and Information Collection
1. Poor 2. Fair 3. Good 4. Very Good 5. Excellent Cant Evaluate
The unit used comparable or benchmark information (e.g., from Institutional Research).
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent Cant Evaluate
COMMENT:
The unit demonstrated how it analyzed its assessment data.
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent Cant Evaluate
COMMENT:
_____________________________________________________________
Guideline IV: Evidence of Unit Goals Being Accomplished
1. Poor 2. Fair 3. Good 4. Very Good 5. Excellent Cant Evaluate
The unit demonstrated how it is accomplishing its goals.
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent Cant Evaluate
COMMENT:
The unit demonstrated how it is not fully accomplishing its goals.
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent Cant Evaluate
COMMENT:
Guideline V: Improvements Based on Assessment
1. Poor 2. Fair 3. Good 4. Very Good 5. Excellent Cant Evaluate
J. The unit demonstrated evidence that improvements based on assessment have been implemented.
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent Cant Evaluate
COMMENT:
Guideline VI: Recommended Changes
1. Poor 2. Fair 3. Good 4. Very Good 5. Excellent Cant Evaluate
The unit indicated how it will make changes in its academic program or curriculum.
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent Cant Evaluate
COMMENT:
The unit indicated how it will make changes in its assessment process (goals, objectives, methods).
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent Cant Evaluate
COMMENT:
Overall:
1. Poor 2. Fair 3. Good 4. Very Good 5. Excellent Cant Evaluate
Overall, how would you evaluate this units assessment report? Please give your overall evaluation of this units report, which may be different from the above items.
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent Cant Evaluate
COMMENT: