music.jpg (38143 bytes)

ASSESSMENT REPORT

Ohio University, Athens

School of Music

1997-1998

Assessment Committee: Gail Berenson, Professor of Piano, Chair

Paul Barte, Assistant Professor of Organ; Dorothy Bryant, Assistant Professor of Music Education; Patricia Pease, Assistant Professor of Voice; Mark Schroeder, Assistant Professor of Cello; Richard Suk, Assistant Professor of Music; Dora Wilson, Professor of Music.

 

The School of Music’s Assessment Committee consists of seven faculty members, charged with the mission of analyzing the assessment procedures employed during the 1997-1998 school year, determining their effectiveness and writing this report. This year’s committee has initiated efforts to acquire more objective quantitative and qualitative assessment information.

 

1a. What are your unit’s goals for student learning?

1b. Indicate how your goals were developed and who was involved.

The School of Music prepares students for various professional and artistic outcomes, including performance, music therapy, theory, composition, musicology and teaching. The School of Music faculty establishes goals which prepare the student for these outcomes, utilizing the most current and relevant pedagogical techniques. These learning goals have been codified to some extent by the National Association of Schools of Music (NASM). The development of comprehensive musicianship is fundamental to all Bachelor and Master of Music degree programs.

The curriculum is designed to enable all students to successfully:

• Perform in public as soloists and in ensembles.

• Demonstrate knowledge of musical styles from theoretical and historical perspectives.

• Demonstrate a working knowledge of musical notation.

The three largest disciplines housed in the School of Music (Performance, Music Therapy and Music Education) differ greatly from one another; each requires distinctive training. The ways in which goals have developed for these areas are also unique. Although many of the goals in performance were established to a great extent by methods of training which have produced many of the most highly accomplished musicians throughout the long history of the art, the faculty continues to advance the pedagogical approaches being used. The fields of music education and music therapy are comparatively new, and the body of knowledge necessary to train individuals for careers in these fields continues to evolve.

MUSIC THERAPY: The School of Music prepares music therapy students for clinical placements in medical, educational, and community health settings. Course work in the undergraduate program prepares students for credentialing and internship. Because music therapy is a certification program, students must apply to the American Music Therapy Association (AMTA) following graduation to be considered for a professional credential, currently referred to as Music Therapist-Board Certified (MT-BC). The students must take the national board examination offered by the Certification Board for Music Therapists (CBMT), an independent credentialing agency, which functions at the national level to certify graduates who successfully complete the exam following the undergraduate program. A minimum of 46 quarter hours are required for the degree Master of music in Music Therapy, which requires additional study in a cognate area outside music. Greater expectations exist for these more advanced students.

MUSIC EDUCATION: The career goal for students in the music education program is public school teaching. Objectives in this curriculum are designed to prepare students for the culminating student teaching experience. Requirements for student teaching are developed by the supervising faculty from the School of Music and the public school faculty, in cooperation with the College of Education. Music education in Ohio is a licensure program, the requirements of which are set in part by the State Board of Education and NASM, which prepares the graduate for the Ohio Multi-Age Licence for teaching music in public schools. In addition to preparing the student to be a more skillful teacher, graduate course work prepares the more advanced student in music education for a career in music administration and supervision, for permanent certification or doctoral study leading to college teaching.

PERFORMANCE: The careers for which the school prepares performance majors are college teaching, independent studio teaching or performance careers. Educational objectives for instrumentalists and vocalists vary according to their career choice. Since many professional situations today require advanced degrees, course requirements are designed to help prepare the student for admission to advanced degree programs.

MUSIC THEORY, MUSIC COMPOSITION, MUSIC HISTORY & LITERATURE: The goals in these curricula prepare the student for academic careers in these areas, most which are likely to require advanced degrees. Those specializing in theory and composition are prepared for careers as theorists and composers; knowledge of compositional techniques and relevant technology is required. The curriculum in music history and literature prepares students for graduate work in music history and research in musicology. Basic music theory and history are also incorporated in the comprehensive training of all music students.

1c. Have they been modified based on previous reports?

Although the basic goals have not changed, there has been considerable revision in specific requirements that help meet these goals.

2a. How did you assess student learning?

2b. What testing instruments, methods and processes did you use to collect assessment data?

Student learning is assessed within the various curricula in the School of Music. In each degree program all students are required to complete core courses and specific competencies in the following areas:

• Performance (solo and ensemble)

• Theory and Aural Skills

• History and Literature

• Music Technology

• Keyboard skills

Progress toward the objectives are assessed through (1) performance tests (juries), (2) written tests, (3) interviews, (4) written assignments, and (5) proficiency exams. The testing instruments, method and processes are detailed in the following list by degree areas.

Undergraduate Assessment

I. Pre-admittance Assessment

- Performance auditions are required for all new students on their major instrument; following the audition, each student is assigned a performance entry level number. Expectations are codified for each level of advancement.

- A music theory written placement examination is required of all entering students.

II. Assessment of Current Students

• All Music Majors

- Students must meet stated minimum keyboard skills proficiency requirements, measured by a keyboard proficiency test.

- Applied music examinations (juries) are required to assess performance ability for advancement in classification. Standards are prescribed for each level of advancement. Both written and oral comments are given for each jury. Students must complete and pass two juries a year, evaluated by a faculty committee.

- The core courses of music theory are sequence courses, and for advancement through the sophomore level (and continuation as a music major), a student must meet minimum grade standards.

- Aural skills and sight singing skills are evaluated first in groups, then in individual evaluation sessions.

- Written theory evaluation includes daily homework assignments and quizzes.

• Performance Majors

- A critical evaluation implemented by the entire division faculty appraising every aspect of the student's performance determines advancement to junior standing.

- Performance majors are required to prepare and perform a minimum of one-half a public recital their junior year and a full public recital their senior year.

• Music Education Majors

- Each student is reviewed annually by the music education faculty. This assessment results in a commendation, warning, or denial of further registration.

- Student academic achievement is measured at the end of the freshman year prior to admission to teacher education in the College of Education.

- Admission to junior standing is dependent upon a comprehensive evaluation of a student’s course work, major instrument classification, recommendations, personal career intention form, interview with music education faculty and admission to professional education through the College of Education.

- Students apply for advanced standing in teacher education after completing a 10-hour block of early field experience courses and successful completion of educational psychology in order to gain admission to advanced standing in teacher education in the College of Education.

- Admission to senior standing follows a final evaluation using the above criteria before approval for student teaching.

- An exit interview takes place just prior to graduation to determine strengths and weaknesses of the student’s educational experience.

• Music Therapy Majors

- The competencies which serve as the basis for the curricula in music therapy were revised in 1996 by faculty and clinical training directors in music therapy programs across the nation, accredited by the National Association of Schools of Music (NASM) and by the National Association for Music Therapy (NAMT)

- During practicum quarters when students are gaining field experience (sophomore, junior, senior years), students return to campus and meet with their faculty supervisor weekly for evaluation.

- A comprehensive evaluation which includes students’ course work, proficiency examinations, major instrument classification, recommendations, personal career intention paper, and interview with professional studies area faculty is required prior to admission to junior standing.

- An exit interview takes place just prior to graduation to determine strengths and weaknesses of the student’s educational experience.

• Music Theory Majors

- A senior project is required, which is subject to oral review by the Academic Studies Area faculty.

• Music Composition

- A senior project is required, which is subject to oral review by Academic Studies area faculty, along with composition(s), which receive public performances.

• Music History and Literature

- A senior project is required, which is subject to oral review by Academic Studies area faculty.

III. Assessment by Graduates

- Data was gathered from the Office of Institutional Research study of recent graduates. The School of Music designed a questionnaire to accompany the institutional research survey.

- A career tracking effort has been launched by the faculty (see appendix).

Graduate Assessment

I. Pre-admittance Assessment:

- Entrance requires music history and theory placement examinations; any deficiencies must be fulfilled before graduation.

- A performance audition is required of all new students on their major instrument (performance majors only).

II. Assessment of Current Students

• All Music Majors

- Faculty advisors meet with students to assist in scheduling programs of study utilizing the results of all placement examinations and auditions.

- Final comprehensive oral examination is required.

• Performance Majors

- Applied music examinations (juries) are required to assess performance ability. Both written and oral comments are given for each jury . Students must complete and pass two juries a year, evaluated by a faculty committee.

- A proficiency level is required on each secondary instrument in the woodwind performance-pedagogy emphasis program.

- A final performance recital is required (pre-recital approval by the teacher and area faculty approval following the recital). (A lecture-recital is permissible for performance/pedagogy majors.)

• Composition Majors

- The entrance exam requires a statement of purpose, scores and recordings.

- A final composition (to be publicly performed) and defense is required.

• Music Therapy Majors

- Entrance requires evidence of prior experience working with handicapped children or adults.

- Entrance requires proficiency examinations in piano, guitar and voice.

- Entrance requires placement interview with music therapy faculty.

- Retention requires successful completion of a diagnostic examination following the first or second quarter of study, to assess student suitability to the profession based on experience and aptitude, to facilitate individualized program planning according to identified needs.

- A final thesis and defense or clinical project is required.

• Music Education Majors

- Entrance requires placement interview with music education faculty.

- A final thesis and defense, recital or independent project is required.

• Music History and Literature

- Must demonstrate reading ability in at least one foreign language

- A final thesis and defense is required.

III. Post Program Assessment

- Data is gathered from the Institutional Research study of recent graduates (one-year and five-year). The School of Music designed a questionnaire to accompany the Institutional Research survey. This spring, data was received on the music questionnaire for the first time.

- A career tracking effort has been launched by the faculty (see appendix).

2c. Have these assessment activities been modified since last year?

- Results from the Ohio University Survey of 1995-1996 Graduates, which included a questionnaire designed by the School of Music, were available. Since this was only the first year of data received, it was determined that no changes would be made in the questionnaire, providing time for additional responses before revising the document.

- A new assessment instrument was designed within the School of Music, adapted from a values questionnaire that appeared in an issue of the Music Educators’ Journal. Music Student Activity Choice (MuSAC see appendix) was implemented this spring. In order for the assessment process to include reflection by music students, the MuSAC was administered to freshmen and junior level students. Since self-evaluation and lifelong learning are a critical part of career success, the MuSAC reflects an attempt to determine how students view their own participation in education and their progress toward career goals. (see #4a for more details.)

- A greater attempt to solicit feedback from the many visiting artists on campus was made. This statement was included in follow-up thank you letters. "The School of Music Assessment Committee is seeking objective, external feedback about how well we are preparing our students to go out into the world to pursue professional careers in music. We would be most grateful if you could send us a brief, written assessment of your experience in working with our students, indicating how their talent and preparation compares to other students in master classes you have taught at other institutions."

3. Detail how you have analyzed the data or other gathered information.

- The very nature of a School of Music involves public assessment, in the form of public performances that range from weekly studio classes to degree solo recitals, to ensemble performances. Final exams in the performance area are presented in front of the entire division faculty, providing ample opportunities for discussion of strengths and weaknesses. With many world-renowned artists invited to the campus to perform and work in master classes with our students, these visiting artists serve as additional, significant resources for feedback. All of this is discussed by faculty in weekly division meetings.

- Results from the longitudinal study, initiated by Ohio University’s Office of Institutional Research, "Change in Student Involvement From the First (Freshman) Year to the Senior Year at Ohio University" were used by the Assessment Committee to compare the School of Music data with that of the university as a whole.

- The Assessment Committee received and compiled data from all assessment instruments and projects. After evaluating the instruments themselves, the data was examined and utilized in the writing of this annual report. All of the data is then submitted to the Director of the School of Music, who brings the results of these studies for discussion to the School of Music Advisory Committee. That committee, which includes representation from each division of the School of Music, then determines how best to disseminate the information to the appropriate faculty and division heads, as needed.

4a. What evidence (assessment information) have you gathered indicating that you are accomplishing your goals?

- Data collected from the School of Music portion of the questionnaire sent out by Ohio University’s Office of Institutional Research to 1995-1996 graduates demonstrated that the alumni surveyed believed that their education served them well. This is the first year that we have targeted alumni and are pleased to have received data from this critical source. We are hopeful that future years will bring in an even greater percentage of alumni responses.

- Data was also received from the Southeastern Ohio Task Force, a group formed to improve the quality of music education in Southeastern Ohio. Feedback came from OU graduates and other active teachers in the region. Much positive information was forthcoming from this group. There were also several suggestions for ways to enhance the music education curriculum (see 4b below).

- Data was received from a follow-up interview that was completed a few weeks after students were given the MuSAC (Music Student Activity Choice, see appendix). The purpose of the follow-up interview was to determine the students’ reaction to the questions, and if they felt that the reflection required in the survey was worthwhile.

- Faculty have been asked to provide information about our alumni, noting the positions they currently hold. In this first year documenting this information, we focused on collecting data about those who have graduated within the past five years. The information gathered to date reaffirms what we already knew: our students are gaining acceptance into graduate programs and are finding positions appropriately related to their education at Ohio University. (see appendix)

4b. What evidence indicates that they are not being fully accomplished?

Although the majority of the responses to the School of Music portion of the questionnaire sent out by Ohio University’s Office of Institutional Research to 1995-1996 graduates were positive, there were several responses that indicated weaknesses in our programs. Two categories of concern were (1) Conducting and (2) Music education methods courses. There were 12 respondents for this question with 17-25% neutral and 17% negative response. Changes are already underway to address some of the weaknesses that were revealed.

The following points were suggested by the Southeastern Ohio Task Force (see #4a):

- More focus on rehearsal techniques

- Music theory focus on score reading and error detection

- Encourage student to take band camp jobs

- Piano proficiency should be at a higher level, especially for instrumental majors

- Vocal pedagogy for students, in order to provide pedagogy methods for students and to help the future teacher learn how to use their voice better throughout the teaching day

- Give students more experience in front of a large ensemble earlier in their study

- Have an experienced teacher talk to music education students

- Instrument repair course

- Require music education students to gain exposure to beginning literature

- Methods classes need to provide more practical experience teaching young students by placing music education students in classroom setting earlier to discover if they have made the right career choice.

5a: What improvements or enhancements have been implemented based on your assessment activities?

5b: How are you using information from your answer to question 3 to improve your program?

• Performance Area

- Keyboard Division

Discussions in studio classes and private lessons made it evident that there was a general lack of knowledge of keyboard literature among our keyboard majors. To address this situation, we have expanded the Piano Literature course. The class is now a one-year, three-quarter sequence: (1) Renaissance and Baroque Keyboard Repertoire, (2) Classical and Romantic Keyboard Repertoire, and (3) Contemporary Keyboard Repertoire. This was offered for the first time this year, 1997-1998.

A number of students requested that a Master of Music in Piano Performance with emphasis in Accompanying degree be made available. These requests came both from current students and from students considering OU as a place to do a master’s degree. This program has been re-instituted with its first student accepted for next year. With this program in place, it is anticipated that high quality pianists possessing special interest and skills in accompanying will be attracted to OU.

Based on such problems as unqualified accompanists, irrational fees, poor preparation, etc., a need was identified for greater control and structure in accompanying (pianists accompanying student singers and instrumentalists for lessons, juries and recitals). Following meetings between the voice and piano divisions, a new process for handling accompanying needs has been established which will benefit all students–both pianists and those whom they accompany. The piano faculty now auditions pianists and classifies them into three levels. They receive compensation according to their level of experience and ability. A remedial "Basic Accompanying" class has been added, non-credit, to help relative beginners move into the next category.

For some years, most of the organ instruction offered by the School of Music was forced to use off-campus facilities for lessons and practicing. This left us dependent on the generosity of area churches. The acquisition of a new organ for Galbreath chapel has made us more self-sufficient and provides students access to a first-rate instrument.

- Voice Division

The voice area was faced with students auditioning to be performance majors who lacked an appropriate level of preparation. To address this situation, more stringent voice entrance audition guidelines have been established.

In response to the need for greater focus on collaborative performance and German Lieder singing in particular, the voice and piano faculty organized a Lieder master class (with visiting artist Benton Hess) and concert.

• Music Education Area

The methods classes offered for music education students included nearly all significant band and orchestral instruments except saxophone. With the addition to our faculty of a new saxophone instructor this year, a saxophone methods class is now offered.

Responding to the data collected by the Southeast Ohio Music Education Task Force, the music education faculty have instituted the following changes:

1. To increase students’ conducting and rehearsing experiences, a lab component has been added to the instrumental music method classes. Students plan and lead rehearsals and participate in the rehearsal on secondary instruments.

2. A music education technology course for music majors will be proposed in the Fall of 1998. In addition, all method classes include at least one assignment related to music technology.

3. The following course content concerns are being addressed: administration, classroom management, improvisation and instrument repair.

• Academic Studies Area

- Theory Division

The freshman music theory course formerly included both written and aural skills. Since some students would do fine in one of these areas and less well in the other, there was a sense that grading could be unfair and that students could get by with marginal skills in one of these areas on the strength of the other. Furthermore, a student’s transcript did not reflect his abilities in each area. Consequently, beginning this year, "Music Theory" and "Dictation and Sight Singing" have been made separate courses, throughout the two-year theory curriculum. It also provides greater scheduling flexibility.

• General improvements affecting all graduate students

Recognizing that many of our graduate piano students, however adept they may be as performers, lack knowledge about establishing themselves professionally, an independent study course (MUS 600) was initiated that focuses on this topic. The course was subtitled, "Career Planning for Pianists." Because of the enthusiastic response from the current students in the class, preparation is underway to make this class available to all graduate students in music. It will be submitted to the Curriculum Committee later this year.

6a. What changes do you recommend for your unit in the future?

In academic program/curriculum:

• All music undergraduate students:

The results of a recent longitudinal study, initiated by Ohio University’s Office of Institutional Research, revealed that music students had a 24% decrease in satisfaction with the instruction in their major courses during the Senior year compared with the level of satisfaction with major courses measured during their freshman year–this in comparison to a 10% increase in satisfaction by students university-wide. It is hoped that curricular changes made within the past two years will alter this conclusion. The results of questionnaires which will be received from the graduating classes of 1999 and 2000 should help to determine whether the course modifications have been effective.

• Performance Area

- Keyboard Division

With the addition of new faculty member to the division specializing in class piano, the division expects to investigate the possibility of designing a proficiency exam for piano performance majors that tests specific skills important to advanced-level pianists.

- Voice Division

Expanded offering of master classes affords students more opportunities to be assessed from outside sources. These will focus on Italian and French repertoire, complementing the intense study of German Lieder this year..

Guest artist recitals, presented by alumna, Sandra Moon (Metropolitan Opera), and by one of the winners of the American Federation of Music Clubs’ national competition. Students will have the opportunity to interact with these young artists in question and answer sessions.

- Brass and Percussion Division

As a means of providing a more rigorous assessment in the area of performance for candidates of the Master of Music degree in Music Education, it is recommended that students audition a) either at the end of the first term (for individuals who plan to complete the degree requirements in one year) or b) at the end of the first year for those individuals engaged in a two- or three-year degree plan.

- String Division

With the addition of a new faculty member to the division, specializing in violin and viola, the division expects to investigate the possibility of designing a sequence of courses to train string players in the performance of orchestral parts, including the repertoire required for auditions for major orchestras.

• All music graduate students:

One broad ranging change that will benefit all graduate students is the addition of a new, non-credit elective course entitled Career Preparation for Musicians. The course proposal will be submitted to the Curriculum Committee for approval later during this calendar year.

- Academic Studies Division (Music Theory)

Proposed curricular changes, subject to approval by the University Curriculum Council will; 1) provide greater array of graduate elective courses in music theory for non-theory music majors; 2) provide a core of courses satisfying the curricular needs of music theory majors at the master’s level; and 3) eliminate the duplication of undergraduate theory at the graduate level.

• Music Education Division

A need has been identified for more course offerings specifically for graduate students. Many courses currently offered are double-listed. Proposals are currently under review for four new courses: (1) Administration, (2) Classroom management, (3) Improvisation, (4) Instrument Repair.

6b. In your department’s assessment process (goals, objectives, methods):

General consensus among all divisions of the unit is that greater follow-up of all of our graduates at specific intervals (two years after graduation, five years, ten years, etc.) would enhance our assessment process significantly. Also, there is an ongoing need to improve the use of collected assessment data. Better communication of the data is an aid in affecting relevant changes. As the assessment data is disseminated to the relevant divisions within the unit, it is hoped that all faculty members involved will assist in reviewing and fine tuning the current assessment instruments in use, thereby increasing effectiveness of the entire assessment process.

Ongoing assessment of a less formal nature (primarily through divisional faculty meetings) will also continue to identify other needs in our programs. These meetings remain a major source of self-assessment and change.

 

Back to Assessments